Gay Marriage Synthesis free essay sample

Everyday in the United States of America people fall in love. Love is its own universal language that helps evoke ones true, deep feelings towards another. Love is not exclusive to any one type of creature or object. A person may love their computer, their pet tabby cat, or another man or woman. Ultimately, when two people are in love they have the option to wed in holy matrimony. Marriage, similar to love, should not be limited to a member of the opposite gender, and same sex marriage should be allowed in America. As time passes and the future draws close, societies views on world wide issues are being altered due to the fact that â€Å"social change is inevitable† (Source H). This, along the results of polls taken on the American public concerning the right for same sex couples to marry, continues being altered every second. A recent study found that â€Å"an astonishing 81% of adults under the age of 30 favor marriage equality,† providing prominent, interesting findings that may hint at the near future of our country (Source A). Day by day the argument grows stronger and stronger on whether or not to discriminate against free Americans with a different viewpoint on love. Same sex couples deserve every right that ordinary couples do, and the majority of America can agree on this standpoint which is pushing for equality. Same sex marriage is protected by the Constitutions commitments to liberty and equality, and rulings in the Supreme Court shall reflect such defenses. Ultimately, what is at stake here is under the control of American morals on whether or not same sex couples should be victimized in court rulings regarding their right to marry when it is obvious that their right is protected multiple times in the US Constitution. Throughout the US Constitution, various discriminations are extirpated as â€Å"it did not tolerate [inequality] in separate schools and drinking fountains, it did not tolerate [inequality] with respect to bans on interracial marriage,† and inequality shall not be tolerated here with regards to granting marriage impartiality (Source C). In history’s past, as community views have been altered, the law has been altered too. Since the law of the land is protecting same sex couples’ right to marry, there should be an unanimous wave of approval rather than an inexhaustible argument on whether or not the law provides limits on such marriages, due to the fact that the law clearly has no blockades on such joinings. As logic takes over in ones mind, the Supreme Court should realize that it is unlawful and immoral to rule against the right for same sex couples to marry peacefully, just as a normal couple would. Furthermore, the concept of â€Å"traditional marriage† being defined as one man and one woman is historically inaccurate. If one is arguing that gay marriage is not traditional, it could be argued that a heterosexual monogamy is unnatural due to history’s past of polygamy, communal child rearing, and the use of mistresses and prostitution. This false definition of traditional marriage helps to address the idea that same sex couples provide equal, if not more, advantages to society and the surrounding communities along with more importantly, causing no harm. In order to analyze such benefits first an exposition of marriage must be provided. Many find that the best definition of marriage is the statements praised as newly weds recite their vows: â€Å"to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness, in health, until death do us part† (Source D). Continually, as far as income is concerned, the United States government could bring approximately 184 million supplementary dollars into a single states economy over 3 years through the cost of gay marriage licenses, and higher income taxes for gays (Source G). On a more family oriented note, a gay couples home life provides a bolstering environment for financial and emotional security, along with generating loving family bonds between many. Furthermore, if a same sex couple were to bear children into their family, it would encourage future generations to ensure equality for all and prevent future discrimination. Overall, there is no set definition on â€Å"traditional marriage† and the myth that gay marriage cause harm to society should be put to rest. Some may argue that marriage is not a right that can just be handed off to anyone; rather they believe that marriage is a privilege. Continually, they may argue that marriage was created in order to support and encourage procreation; however, although same sex couples cannot produce offspring together, they can provide support to children in need whom heterosexual couples have abandoned, or children who may not have a loving a caring family-something a same sex couple may be able to provide. On a similar note, other civilians against gay marriage may altercate that allowing same sex marriage will encourage young children to act out against societies’ general morals. This is an illogical argument do to the fact that gay marriage does not encourage any unlawful or illegal behaviors in young children. As Source B jokes, as a result of gays marrying the only consequence will be that gays marry. The icecaps will not melt, Russia will not invade, judgment day will not begin and families will not be destroyed. Society will always have bountiful changes of view, and we must alter our laws to protect the general morals and beliefs of the community in order to provide our country with infinite benefits. Remember, although gay marriage may seem like a nerve wracking change, you will survive as will the world, providing us only with a stronger sense of moral equality.